Criminal Justice / Welfare System neglect deflected onto Penn State / Paterno

Posted on July 23rd, 2012 in News and Commentary

For those  desirous of knowing what actually took place as well as the multitude infected by the current hysteria  in large part instituted by former Attorney General and current Governor Tom Corbett to deflect blame from himself, the following re-print of Bill Keisling’s January 24th, 2012 article will serve as at least a partial antidote.

Timeline: Penn State / Sandusky / Corbett

Posted on January 24th, 2012 in Keisling on Pennsylvania Politics, News and Commentary

A part of a RealReporting.org/Newslanc.com series

By Bill Keisling

Editor’s note: Associates of Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett say there is more to the Penn State / Jerry Sandusky scandal than meets the eye.

Events took place over decades, many people are involved, and it is a complex story. NewsLanc accordingly has put together a detailed timeline based upon public record, published accounts, and information from those close to the situation. This timeline serves as an introduction and guide to articles that will soon follow.

The connections among pedophilia, illegal drugs, and politics in the state attorney general’s office suggests that, like an iceberg, there is much more beneath the surface than the Sandusky pedophilia charges indicate.

1950: Joe Paterno is hired by Penn State as an assistant football coach.

1966: Joe Paterno is named head coach of Penn State football team.

1969: Jerry Sandusky is hired as assistant coach at Penn State. Sandusky and his wife begin adopting their first of six children.

1977: Sandusky forms the Second Mile charity. The foundation takes its name from Matthew 5:38-41: “Should anyone press you into service for one mile, go with him for two miles.” (Catholic) “And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two.” (King James version)

1995: Sandusky’s adopted son, Matt, attempts suicide shortly after moving in with the Sanduskys, prompting Matt’s probation officer to write letters to a judge saying that she was concerned about Matt’s “safety and his current progress.”

October 3, 1995: Tom Corbett is appointed Pennsylvania Attorney General following the resignation of AG Ernie Preate, who is indicted on federal mail fraud and corruption charges for taking payoffs from organized crime and gambling interests. Interim AG Corbett fills out Preate’s term until January 22, 1997. In late 1996, AG Corbett learns of an ongoing sex ring in York, Pennsylvania, involving Republican State Senator Dan Delp and dozens of other “VIPs.” AG Corbett intentionally cripples or otherwise bungles that investigation, York city officials assert. The York sex ring continues unabated.

May 1998 : Report of Jerry Sandusky in PSU shower room lifting Victim 6 up to shower head. After Sandusky brought her son home with wet hair, Victim 6’s mother reports the incident to Penn State University police. The complaint was referred to Ray Gricar, the District Attorney of Centre County. The case was first assigned to Centre County Assistant DA Karen Arnold. Arnold had the case for “two or three days,” she says, and then DA Gricar took the case from her, saying he (Gricar) was going to personally handle it. No charges were filed.

May 1999: Coach Joe Paterno tells Sandusky that Sandusky will not be named Paterno’s replacement as head PSU football coach, and Sandusky retires with emeritus status. Sandusky still has access to Penn State facilities. The grand jury presentment states: “Victim 4 remembers Sandusky being emotionally upset after having a meeting with Joe Paterno in which Paterno told Sandusky he would not be the next head coach at Penn State and which preceded Sandusky’s retirement. Sandusky told Victim 4 not to tell anyone about the (Paterno) meeting. That meeting occurred in May, 1999.”

Fall 2000: PSU janitor James Calhoun reports to other janitors that he witnessed Sandusky performing oral sex on a boy in the Lasch Building shower room.

March 1, 2002: Graduate assistant Mike McQueary says he observes Sandusky apparently having anal sex with a young boy in the Lasch Building shower room. That night McQueary talks with his father and discusses what to do. The next day, March 2, McCreary meets with Coach Joe Paterno and tells Paterno explicitly what he had observed. Paterno tells McQueary, “‘Well, I’m sorry you had to see that. It’s terrible.’ And he said, ‘I need to think and tell some people about what you saw and I’ll let you know what — what we’ll do next.’” (December 16, 2011 preliminary hearing transcript page 26.) Paterno reports the incident to his boss, PSU Director of Athletics, Tim Curley, the following Monday. The grand jury presentment reads (page 8): “Schultz testified that he was called to a meeting with Joe Paterno and Tim Curley, in which Paterno reported ‘disturbing’ and ‘inappropriate’ conduct in the shower by Sandusky upon a young boy, as reported to him by a student or graduate student.”

The presentment further reads (page 7): “Approximately one and a half weeks later, the graduate assistant was called to a meeting with Penn State Athletic Director Curley and Senior Vice President for Finance and Business Gary Schultz. The graduate assistant reported to Curley and Schultz that he had witnessed what he believed to be Sandusky having anal sex with a boy in the Lasch Building showers. Curley and Schultz assured the graduate assistant that they would look into it and determine what further action they would take. Paterno was not present for this meeting.”

Late March 2002: Curley contacts McQueary to say that Sandusky no longer has keys to the PSU locker room, and that the incident has been reported to Second Mile charity. Curley and Schultz meet with PSU President Graham Spanier, according to the grand jury presentment, “to report an incident with Jerry Sandusky that made a member of Curley’s staff ‘uncomfortable.’”

The presentment reads (page 7): “The graduate assistant heard back from Curley a couple of weeks later. He was told that Sandusky’s keys to the locker room were taken away and that the incident had been reported to The Second Mile. The graduate assistant was never questioned by University Police. … Curley testified that he informed Dr. Jack Raykovitz, Executive Director of the Second Mile of the conduct reported to him and met with Sandusky to advise Sandusky that he was prohibited from bringing youth onto the Penn State campus from that point forward.”

The presentment further relates (page 9) that: “Schultz testified that the 1998 incident was reviewed by the University Police and ‘the child protection agency’ with the blessing of then-University counsel Wendell Courtney. Courtney was then and remains counsel for The Second Mile.”

January 18, 2005: Tom Corbett is sworn in as Pennsylvania’s 46th Attorney General, having won election the previous November.

March 31, 2005: AG Corbett holds a press conference with Centre County DA Ray Gricar to announce the prosecution of Taji “Verbal” Lee in the “largest heroin operation that we have ever seen in Centre County, feeding a drug trade that stretched throughout the region and allegedly resulted in at least one deadly overdose,” AG Corbett says. Senior Deputy Attorney General Michael T. Madeira, who works in AG Corbett’s Drug Strike Force Section, will prosecute this drug case, AG Corbett announces. The State College newspaper reports that, “Gricar pointed out that heroin and cocaine were problems that have been increasing throughout Pennsylvania.”

April 15, 2005: Centre County District Attorney Ray Gricar vanishes.

April 20, 2005 : Days after DA Gricar’s disappearance, a former Brigham Young University offensive lineman makes a splash in the national press by saying there is widespread steroid use in college athletics, including at BYU.

April 2005: In a press conference in Bellefonte, PA, Bellefonte Police Chief Duane Dixon, when asked about a possible connection between DA Gricar’s disappearance and drug cases, says, “They’re looking into that.” Referring to decisions already made in Attorney General Corbett’s office, Dixon says, “they don’t think” drug cases had anything to do with DA Gricar’s strange disappearance. Though Chief Dixon has jurisdiction in the missing person case, he cedes authority in this area to the attorney general’s office. Chief Dixon points out that the recent “Verbal” Lee heroin case, for example, was not actually prosecuted by DA Gricar, but by Senior Deputy Attorney General Michael Madeira.

January 2006: Tom Corbett’s drug prosecutor, former Deputy Attorney General Michael Madeira, is sworn in as the new district attorney of Centre County, replacing missing DA Ray Gricar.  There is still no serious investigation of Gricar’s disappearance. Instead, unsubstantiated reports in the press of Gricar sightings from strangers are treated as reasons not to suspect foul play.

March 2009: Citing a personal conflict of interest between himself and Jerry Sandusky, Centre County DA Madeira refers a pedophile complaint or complaints involving Sandusky to his former boss, Pennsylvania AG Corbett. Corbett associates says Corbett makes it clear to his staff that he does not want to prosecute the Sandusky case, and effectively places the Sandusky investigation in limbo.

Between May to September 2009: Pennsylvania’s two statewide grand juries are in recess, as normal, for summer.

September 14, 2009: AG Tom Corbett formally announces that he is running for governor of Pennsylvania. The Harrisburg Patriot-News -driven “Bonusgate” scandal becomes the core of Corbett’s political campaign for governor. The Patriot portrays AG Corbett as a corruption-fighting crime buster.

There are only two statewide grand juries at any time, each with 18-month terms. Grand jurors only meet part time, a few hours each week. In an effort to get Tom Corbett elected governor, the grand jury time is by now almost totally saturated by “Bonusgate” matters.

December 10, 2009: Acquittal in “Bonusgate” trial of former state Rep. Sean Ramaley. Corbett fears for his election prospects. AG Corbett orders all the agents in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation to drop whatever they are doing to perform background checks on approximately 350 potential jurors in the “Bonusgate” jury pool. Corbett says he suspects jury tampering by his political opponents. The Sandusky investigation continues to languish.

November 2, 2010: AG Tom Corbett is elected governor of Pennsylvania.

November 2010: First Deputy Attorney General William Ryan, a longtime career prosecutor in the AG’s office, is mentioned in the state press as a logical contender for appointment as Corbett’s replacement as attorney general.

Ryan however soon learns that he will be passed over by Corbett for the honor. Ryan is increasingly the de facto AG after the November election while Corbett is absorbed by the transition. Corbett associates say Ryan is “pissed off,” and tells AG office staff that he will make no major changes until the permanent AG is sworn in sometime in 2011.

November 2010: AG Office Bureau of Narcotics Investigation and Drug Control Agent Anthony Sassano, conducting a narcotics investigation, performs a “toll search” of telephone records and gets a hit on the office PACE system (Police Assisted Computerized Entry) that reveals to Sassano the Sandusky pedophile investigation that has stalled within the AG’s office. Agent Sassano soon learns of the 1998 and 2002 pedophile complaints involving Sandusky.

Also in November 2010: AG’s office investigators researching the 1998 and 2002 pedophile complaints against Sandusky recognize that the one person who has crucial information about the Sandusky Centre County pedophile investigation(s) — former DA Ray Gricar — has been missing for more than five years. This raises the question: What happened to Ray Gricar?

December 2010: Penn State assistant football coach Mike McQueary is finally put in front of the Thirtieth Statewide Grand Jury. This is what should have happened in March 2009, Corbett associates say. The grand jury presentment states, “The graduate assistant (McQueary) was never questioned by University Police and no other entity conducted an investigation until he testified in Grand Jury in December, 2010.”

January 12, 2011: Penn State officials Curley and Shultz are called to the grand jury.  Coach Joe Paterno also testifies before the grand jury in January 2011. Curley and Shultz tell the grand jury that they were never told by McQueary of any sexual contact. The grand jury will charge Curley and Schultz with perjury.

January 18, 2011: Tom Corbett is sworn in as governor of Pennsylvania. At the moment of Corbett’s inauguration, per the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, First Deputy AG William Ryan automatically becomes Acting AG. This is a “Magic Moment.” Acting AG Ryan and the other professional staff are not beholden to politics or politicians, as they have been for some years.

Late January 2011: The Thirtieth Statewide Grand Jury’s term expires.

Late January 2011: Seven additional state police and AG office agents are assigned to the Sandusky case.

February 8, 2011: Gov. Corbett officially nominates Linda Kelly to succeed him as attorney general. The state senate won’t confirm Kelly until May 23, 2011. Until she is confirmed, William Ryan remains Acting AG.

February 2011: New Thirty-Third Statewide Grand Jury is convened.

February 2011: Karen Arnold, the former assistant district attorney who originally handled the Sandusky case in 1998 for DA Ray Gricar, is asked to testify before the Thirty-Third Statewide Grand Jury. It is a totally new grand jury that uses information from the former grand jury(s).

March 10, 2011: Arnold testifies before the grand jury. Arnold will later say there are aspects of the Sandusky case ignored by the grand jury.

May 23, 2011: AG nominee Linda Kelly is confirmed by the state senate and only now becomes Pennsylvania attorney general.

August 19, 2011:

August 19, 2011: Gov. Tom Corbett appoints former acting AG William Ryan as chairman of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board.

November 2011: Grand jury presentment is released and Jerry Sandusky is charged with pedophile crimes.

November 2011 onward: PSU Coach Joe Paterno, and university president Graham Spanier both are fired at Gov. Tom Corbett’s behest. A student riot ensues in State College. A new head football coach will be hired despite protests by Penn State alumni and players. There is no indication that anyone from the existing PSU football staff will be retained.

Voting Instructions–PSU BOT

ballot links are provided automatically to alumni (with email addresses on file) who are members of the Penn State Alumni Association, have held membership within the past two years, or have contributed to the University within the past two years.

 

Additionally, any alum is eligible and encouraged to participate. All they would need to do is email BOT@psu.edu and provide the following:

1. Full Name

2. Year of Graduation

3. College/Major

4. Current Home mailing address

 

If alums submit this information by Thursday, March 29, we can add them to the list of those individuals receiving a ballot link on April 10. Any requests received after March 29 will be processed after April 10. Alums can request to participate until May 2, close of business (5 pm). However, it is advisable for alums to submit their request as early as possible in order to participate.

Why are PSAT Choice Candidates Running for Board of Trustees

Weekly Topic – Why are you running?  And love of the University is not enough as we all love the University.

 

Sam Zamrik Ph.D., 1961, 1965 (http://samyzamrik.com/) – Well, I could not simply stand by and see what’s happening to Penn State‘s reputation and the action of the board, the disgraceful scandal, and the media that tried to destroy the institution that I have spent 40 years of my life serving.  I am advocating structure change in the charter’s board membership so we can have an adequate alumni representation to institute transparency and open communication. Public trust and confidence must be restored in Penn State’s leadership.

Joanne C DiRinaldo, EdD, 1978 (http://www.joannedirinaldo.com/). – As an advisory board member at Penn State New Kensington campus, there is gap in the communication and streamlining of collaborative efforts with University Park. Commitment to student growth and economic development across the entire university is essential.  I would be honored to serve my alumni constituents knowing they have my utmost dedication to protect and maintain their welfare while carrying out the university mission.

 

Myke Triebold, 1972 (http://pennstatetrustee.com/) – I believe as a trustee I would be able to examine and work on changing the bylaws, policies, and procedures that resulted in the debacle of a scandalous 2011. Structural changes in the board need to be made to create different representation, accountability, and openness for decision making regarding the future of Penn State, especially in regards to university fiscal policies, relationships with Harrisburg legislators, and our reputation outside of Happy Valley.

 

Scott Munroe, 1998 (http://www.facebook.com/scott.k.munroe)-  I am running because we have a clearly broken system, which is evident in the issues surrounding the Sandusky trial, but also exists in our overall culture of administration, values, and the decision making process.  We need to reestablish institutional self-control and the need to follow good planning practices that maximize the value of existing resources instead of acting as enablers by supporting a building boom while existing space goes underutilized and tuition becomes the most expensive in the nation for a public university.  We must do this while changing the Board of Trustees from a group that is interested in the prestige, money and power of a closed group, with a lack of leadership to one that is responsive and hold dear the values of being a Penn State Alumni, and the lives of innocents.

 

Scott Fozard, 1989 (http://www.Fozard4BOT.com) – The way that everything regarding the Sandusky scandal has been handled to this point shows a complete lack of leadership and vision at the highest levels within Penn State. I would like to help transform the BOT as an “outsider” as I am not a money and power player who will likely end up supporting the established group-think mentality of those current money and power players now in control. My role will be to help fill our leadership void by contributing strong character, unwavering ethics and true vision…not just money for facilities and / or padded resumes.

86 Penn State alumni compete for 3 seats on university’s board of trustees

The Drawing for Ballot Positions

Published: Wednesday, February 29, 2012,  7:47 PM
The Patriot-News some of this article is excerpted from:  The Patriot-News

The key to success in this election, said Scott Munroe, will be to show alumni you are not a one-issue candidate.     “We’re going to have to push beyond just re-organizing the board and investigating Sandusky,” Munroe said. “We pretty much all agree on that.”     That means rebuilding the connection between the state and the university.     Joanne DiRinaldo, who already sits on the board of Penn State’s New Kensington campus, wants to improve communication for the branch campuses.     Some of these candidates have aligned themselves with groups like Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship or Penn State Alumni Trust Choice, (Scott Munroe, Scott Fozard, Sam Y Zamrik, Joanne DiRinaldo, and Myke Atwater Triebold).  Others are running on their own.     Wednesday’s drawing was a chance for many of these people to meet for the first time. The mood was collegial, though Anne Riley, the only incumbent alumni trustee running for re-election, did not attend.   At least fifteen candidates are attorneys, and seven work in finance. Eight candidates live in the State College area. Thirty-four live outside Pennsylvania.

Six has Become Five–PSAT-Choice

PSAT-Choice has learned that Mike Ceres has had a change of plans and will not be running for the board of trustees during this election cycle.

Penn State Alumni Group Wants More Openness From Trustees

Published: Monday, February 27, 2012, 6:33 PM     Updated: Tuesday, February 28, 2012, 8:42 AM

The Penn State Alumni Trust-Choice, a self-formed group comprising six candidates vying for the three alumni trustee seats up for election this spring, also are advocating a reorganization of the board’s structure.

They want to see the board transform itself to be transparent and responsive to all. The candidates comprising this group are accountant Scott Fozard, Penn State professor emeritus Sam Zamrik, pharmaceutical and biotech industry executive Joanne DiRinaldo, real estate consultant Myke Triebold, and landscape architect Scott Munroe.

Additionally, a group called PSU Alumni for Reorganization of the Board of Trustees is researching other land-grant universities‘ structure to identify reforms that it would like to see be implemented at Penn State. Members of Penn State’s Faculty Senate also have expressed an interest in exploring university governance reforms as well.

PSAT Position Statements on Budget, Tuition at Penn State

PSAT-Choice Overview – The Penn State Alumni Trust – Choice (PSAT or PSAT-Choice) began with the goal of righting the course of our University’s governing structure, starting with the Board of Trustees, to remove the veil of secrecy and transform the Board and our Administration into a responsive and transparent organization that truly has the mission and advancement of our University as its core focus.

Weekly Topic – What are your views on the Penn State’s budget, tuition, and / or facilities expansions issues.

Scott Fozard, 1989 (facebook.com/Fozard.4.BOT) – We have an apparent disconnect between the public perception of PSU’s budget / tuition woes and the ongoing level of facilities expansion. I say apparent because the lack of BOT transparency makes it challenging to properly assess the issues. The BOT has not taken responsibility for the effective utilization of University resources and has not provided leadership to enhance resource utilization and effectively communicate its strategy relative to the contradictions from facilities expansion and budget / tuition concerns.

Sam Zamrik Ph.D., 1961, 1965 (http://kttekweb.com/samyzamrik/) – With expected budget cuts, it is imperative that a thorough review of Penn State expenditures be scrutinized and this idea to keep building new facilities has to stop. The cost of the Millennium building of $228 million is outrageous, even if the claim is coming for contributions. Plus look at the Hockey arena of $89 million from a donor, but there is still a question about the upkeep cost that Penn State has to endure.

Joanne C DiRinaldo, EdD, 1978 (http://www.joannedirinaldo.com/). - In order to address Governor Corbett’s proposed budget cut plan by 20% to the state system of higher education, Penn State will either have to reduce expenses, increase tuition or take more out of the endowment. Endowments have historically been used to fund research and not for the taking care of  business, “teaching students.” Let’s take a closer look at Penn State’s approximately $2B endowment fund.

Myke Triebold, 1972,82 (http://pennstatetrustee.com/) - As the land grant university for the Commonwealth, Penn State is deserving of the Lion’s share of state money for higher education–and the BOT has failed its responsibility to maintain this relationship.  The large scale building (and resulting rise in administrative and maintenance costs)  that has occurred over the last 20 years has caused the tuition to become the highest in the nation and created a “private university” impression for lawmakers in Harrisburg.

Scott Munroe, 1998 (http://www.facebook.com/scott.k.munroe)- As Penn State now goes through the latest rounds of potential budget cuts we are forced to look at the way in which our Board of Trustees have miss-managed our University’s budget.  We have one of the lowest percentages of State Funding of any Land Grant University, one of the highest gaps in Educational Quality verse available Faculty resources (of a top 50 ranked University), the highest in-state tuition rates for a public institution, and we are still building at an alarming rate thus increasing our serviceable debt and our administrative and operating costs all, while our available funding is decreasing.  This is not a model for long term success and we need to find a way to effectively make our tuition more competitive while closing the gap in Educational Quality and faculty resources.

Who Is PSAT–Penn State Alumni Trust-Choice

Vote for Indpendence and Transparency

The basic answer is that PSAT-Choice began with the goal of correcting the course of our University’s governing structure, starting with the Board of Trustees.  It is our plan to remove the veil of secrecy and transform the Board and our Administration into a responsive and transparent organization that truly has the mission and advancement of our University as its core focus.

 We are a group of five independent candidates that all have the common goal of reorganizing the structure of the Board of Trustees.  We all feel that the issues we face at Penn State go beyond that of merely removing the current members and replacing them.  We have a system that needs to be transformed to again serve the best interests of the mission of our University and the State of Pennsylvania.  Another focus of our group is to educate the alumni about choices to fill the three open slots, and encourage each voter  to look at the biographies and platforms of each candidate and select ones that they are truly comfortable.  Who do you feel will best represent the interests of the University going forward?  We do not believe that a voter should be bound to a restricted slate of candidates when voting for something as important and personal as how the future of Penn State is directed.

We are independent candidates with common goals within our platforms and visions for the future of Penn State.  We have agreed to work together for the purposes of sharing resources, while still running separate campaigns.

 

The Main Gate at College Avenue

Penn State Alumni Trust- Choice (PSAT-Choice) Announce Candidacy

Penn State is at a crossroads, not because our research and education are not strong.  In fact, it is stronger then ever.  What has brought us to this crossroads are the top levels of our administration.  We have a leadership void that has created a Board of Trustees and Administration that turned a blind eye to the Sandusky scandal until it was too late.  The board members still distances themselves from their responsibilitis and actions.  This has led to the deterioration of the health, welfare, reputation and moral integrity of our University.

It is time for a change, from the inside out.  We need trustees that can not only transform the Board from an organization that hides behind non-disclosure laws to one that is transparent and responsive to all.  The new Board we seek needs to be capable of maintaining its responsibilities and reasonableness as guardians of our University’s campuses and the educational mission of our Land Grant institution.  These five candidates represent a strong future for our beloved Penn State University. The Penn State Alumni Trust for Choice (PSAT-Choice) strongly endorses them and encourages you to further examine their backgrounds and platforms.  PSAT-Choice began with the goal of righting the course of our University’s governing structure, starting with the Board of Trustees, to remove the veil of secrecy and transform the Board and our Administration into a responsive and transparent organization that truly has the mission and advancement of our University as its core focus.

To this end the Penn State Alumni Trust for Choice (PSAT-Choice) is pleased to announce the following five strong, determined, independent, and dedicated candidates to elect this April:

Marlene “Myke” Atwater Triebold, BS, A.T.,C.

Joanne DiRinaldo, EdD

Sam Y Zamrik

Scott Munroe

Scott Fozard